| |
Business succession is the transfer of assets, capital, contacts, power,
skills, and authority from one generation of ownership to the next. Family
business succession has the dual goals of preserving the business and the
family. Every business needs a succession plan. It is the equivalent of a
will or an estate plan for the business.
Succession planning in family business is complicated and difficult.
Emotions, subjective criteria, and family history often factor heavily in
the decision-making process about who gets what role in the family
business. By way of contrast, publicly-held companies face fewer
emotionally charged issues when it comes to succession planning. By and
large, companies with a broad base of owners are mandated to use rational
criteria in making business decisions.
When family businesses and closely-held partnerships confront the
succession process, a significant portion of the interested parties can
become embroiled in a range of conflicts because they do not have a
well-developed succession plan. When the assets involved are substantial,
these succession crises make industry headlines. These disasters make us
cringe, but they are, unfortunately, common. And many are predictable and
preventable. The way to prevent conflicts is by developing a workable
succession plan.
Grooming a Successor---Early
One of the most important facets of succession planning is deciding who
the next leader will be, and spending ample timeŠ
preferably yearsŠ grooming the person.
Unfortunately, many businesses rely too much on the founder's persona. So
if the founder dies, there is high risk that the business will, as well.
To address this serious challenge, start documenting all procedures,
policies, and key assets and resourcesŠ
all necessary information so that the business will not skate into an
insurmountable crisis if the founder or current CEO /president were “hit
by a bus” and the business system went into a state of shock.
Successful succession planning also includes a thoughtful determination
as to what leadership qualities and skills the next leader should possess.
Identifying qualified candidates based on specific criteria is
indispensable to the process. Discuss the criteria with potential
candidates, including their interests in running the business. Devising an
evaluation process and setting goals for the candidates can make it easier
over time to choose the best one. Allowing candidates to lead projects so
their performance as leaders and their ability to engage with employees
and customers can be assessed is an important piece of the due diligence
leadership puzzle. If no one shows appropriate interest and appropriate
leadership qualities and skills, it may be necessary to recruit the
successor/leader from outside the business or to sell.
Communication
is Key
The key to effective succession planning is communication. As in real
estate where value depends on “location, location, location,” succession
planning requires “communication, communication, communication.” Because
succession planning in family business and partnerships is often very
difficult emotionally, many avoid the problem. Often the parties believe
that talking about these problems will lead to conflict that is damaging
to the relationships and the business. But avoidance does not resolve the
problem. However, since the participants have emotional reactions, the
process must be monitored and addressed in a satisfactory manner so that
the conflicts are managed and resolved. In some situations, it is
advisable to engage an objective third party facilitator who understands
the challenges and can help manage the succession process.
In other words succession does not just happen. It requires careful
planningŠeveryone involved needs to
become part of the team, planning together so the succession process
develops smoothly and effectively.
Trust, Respect, and Recognition
A central requirement needed for accomplishing the goal of a successful
transition is sufficient trust, respect, and recognition of the needs for
the participants. The older generation needs to trust that the asset will
be preserved. If the older generation is worried that a lifetime of hard
work might be dissipated by the next generation, there will not be
sufficient trust to proceed to a fruitful conclusion of the plan.
At the same time, the second generation needs to trust that they will
have respect, power, and decision-making authority. Included here is the
need for some new on-the job training and experience. This usually means
that the second generation will not only do some things differently, but
will make some mistakes in judgment and execution. If the next generation
believes that it will always be second guessed and judged imprudent, there
will not be sufficient trust to proceed to a successful conclusion of the
plan.
For example, a mid-size, light manufacturing, third generation entity was
stymied because the second generation wanted to protect asset valuations
by not investing in new projects and equipment. Their motto was, “a penny
saved is a penny earned.” The third generation, however, wanted to enter
into new business sectors, taking some risks it judged reasonable. For
several years the two generations were out of alignment, resulting in
significant business and inter-generational tensions. As a result,
buy-sell agreements were not implemented; shareholder valuations were the
articulated focus for the conflicting parties.
When the level of trust by either party is insufficient, negative
reactions are bound to surface. Reluctance of the older generation to give
up control may be greeted by the second generation with disappointment,
suspicion and cynicism. On the other hand, because the aging process
itself entails the loss of power, strength, and authority, the older
generation may experience the transition of power as a loss of virility.
For its part, the younger generation may feel that there is emotional
resistance to passing the torch. e next generation may express its
frustration and annoyance with the pace of change, doubting that success
in gaining real, meaningful, and complete ownership will be achieved.
To address these obstacles, the family and business team that wants to
move the succession process forward might consider addressing the
following list of obstacles to business succession planning. In going
through the list of these ten prevalent obstacles, the participants will
be helped to think about and discuss issues that they otherwise might
choose to minimize and gloss overŠto
their own detriment.
Ten most prevalent obstacles to family business succession planning: *
-
Ineffective expression of feelings and wants
-
Differences are seen as a liability rather than an asset
-
Indirect communication
-
Entitlement
-
Scarcity – “There isn't enough to go around”
-
Financial bottom line
-
Emotional bottom line
-
History of conflicts, disappointments, frustrations
-
“Other-Oriented” when it comes to change -- blaming others and expecting
them to change
-
Control
-
Lack
of forgiveness
-
Lack
of appreciation, recognition, and love
As an exercise, I have recommended and facilitated that the parties start
with the first obstacle: ineffective expression of feelings and wants.
When some parties express their feelings or wants ineffectively, they are
gently assisted in elaborating on their concerns so that the parties
understand the meaning and context more fully, and the process is not
deprived of sufficient information. Progress may then flow more smoothly.
Similarly, if the parties talk privately to the corporate attorney or
estate-planning attorney, without some direct communication among
themselves, the parties are helped to see that some important differences
may be obscured or seen as obstacles rather than as differences that can
be positively woven into the process and outcome.
Each of the above obstacles may be benefited by some review. In so doing,
the ability to discuss differences in a respectful, friendly manner
reinforces positive relationships. As a consequence, this helps determine
the succession process and the outcome. This means that the alternative,
where the parties blame the other side, expecting the other side to
change, is experienced as only complicating the succession process, since
blaming blocks the succession change process and the final
resolution/outcome.
Only when each party takes responsibility for resolving the unavoidable
process of succession, can a difficult condition become a resolvable
collaboration opportunity. In the end, the goal is not only to understand
each side's positions and come to a successful resolution that works well
enough for the interested parties over the long haul, but to preserve both
the business asset and the family/partnership relationships.
*Tom
Hubler, Family Business Review, vol. XII, no. 2, June 1999. |